Bill supporters in Washington and beyond have been ecstatic all week, since Washington Lyme Disease Advocate and Bill co-auther Dan Boeholt’s announcement that WA Bill 5448 (a Bill to Recognize Chronic Lyme Disease) has passed unanimously on the Senate floor and moves to House Hearing! I had high hopes for this Bill being supported, but unanimous support is incredibly encouraging.
In addition to announcements from Dan and other supporters, the March 3rd unanimous vote received positive coverage in The Daily World.com. The article describes the current bill language, as well as Boeholt’s desires that other treatments, in addition to antibiotics, be addressed as well.
You can continue to watch for updates from Dan at the Ticked Off On Lyme WA Facebook page, as well as this Bill Information page and other legislative links at the bottom of this post.
*Please quickly double check one or both locations if you are reading this after the second week of March to see if the hearing noted below has already occurred, at which time different action may needed rather than this current step. The hearing could reportedly occur between March 12 and April 1.
How to Help
If you haven’t yet supported Washington state’s proposed Chronic Lyme Bill, you are just in time to quickly help with the next needed round of support (the last round being emails to all Senators). If you’ve already written directly to the Health Care and Wellness Committee Representatives, that is excellent–you are all caught up (so far).
*There is no longer a need to write to the Senators as previously requested, since the Bill has now moved to the Senate floor. Please write the 15 Committee members at this time.
For quick reference, there is information below so you can easily:
- Look over the summary or draft of the Bill;
- Copy an example message into an email or write your own;
- Paste the Committee’s email addresses into the bcc box;
- Send your email (and perhaps save a copy for friends/family to refer to);
- Send a note to friends and family asking them to quickly do the same.
Excerpts from Facebook posts by Washington patient and advocate Kristine Moden included in later sections contain a heartfelt request, background, email addresses, instructions, and an example/form letter. Those pieces combined, or a clear and concise Facebook post from Kristine (here) are a convenient option for reaching out friends and family.
Why to Help
This Bill is important for Washington state residents and non-residents, and not just those currently infected with Lyme.
If you recreate or work outdoors or you have a pet or a yard (or leave your house at any time) it may some day matter to you or a loved one that there be adequate care available where you live.
If you live in another state (as I do, though I am native to Washington), it is still worth your time to support this legislation on behalf of patients everywhere who are fighting for better diagnosis and care for Lyme disease. Successes in each state contribute to efforts elsewhere, awareness in general, and addressing the current urgent need for change.
About the Bill
The current Bill is described in the summary below, “From Substitute Bill Report, Mar. 3” and the initial Bill, applicable when letters were previously written to all senators, is described in the summary “From First-Reading Bill Report, Feb. 2” (included for reference or comparison, particularly for those writing second letters).
The following resources and excerpts provide further information and history regarding this Bill so far:
- A list of relevant links (end of post),
- The Daily World.com article (mentioned earlier),
- The initial and current bill summaries (below and Bill Reports),
- Testimony summary (below and Bill Reports),
- Previous posts (listed at end post).
Kristine Moden (WA State Lyme Patient) Facebook Posts/Instructions:
*Excerpted and posted with permission
WA Lyme Bill 5448, has moved to the Senate Floor. It’s moving but we still need your support!
Good news. WA Lyme Bill SB 5448 has already moved to the senate floor. This happened on March 3rd, earlier than the expected March 11th deadline. The battle is still not over though. We still need emails sent to support the bill, this time to Representatives. We are waiting on a hearing date in Olympia, WA. I don’t know if I’ll be able to make it myself due to my health but I’m going to try my hardest. Your emails are very important. The bill is moving but we still have a long way to go. Again, if it’s not too much trouble, I ask residents and non-residents to email the form letter below and BCC the list of Representatives. If you haven’t sent an email yet to the Senators please disregard my previous email because the bill has already moved to the Senate Floor and we now need to send emails to Representatives on the Health Care and Wellness Committee. This is a new group of people, 15 only. Contacting them would make a tremendous impact and is very much needed. Thank you so very much for being a part of this and for your help in making the WA state Lyme Bill a reality. I never thought in a million years that this would occur and am very excited that it may finally happen. Thanks to Dan Boeholt, an Aberdeen, WA resident, and co-author of the bill. If it were not for him, this bill would never have been created. Thank you so very much to Dan and to all of you for your support!! Kristine
Kristine’s Instructions/Request:
Hello Everyone,
Can you take a moment and send an email to support WA Lyme Bill 5448 Recognizing Chronic Lyme Disease. The list of Representatives who are on the Health Care and Wellness Committee are below. I’ve written a short form letter but it pertains to me so you will need to change it a bit. BCC instructions just as we did with the NY and MA bills are also below. State by state we’ll get there!
Instructions: In the subject line title the email: Please support Lyme Bill SB 5448 Recognizing Chronic Lyme disease. Copy and paste the below Representative list into the BCC box, leave the To: box empty, copy the form letter or write your own, type your name and info at the bottom and hit send. The process should only take about five minutes.
Kristine’s Email List (Health Care and Wellness Committee Representatives ):
Committee Representative list, to cut and paste all email addresses into the BCC box:
Caldier.Michelle@leg.wa.gov, Judy.Clibborn@leg.wa.gov, Eileen.Cody@leg.wa.gov, Richard.DeBolt@leg.wa.gov,
Paul.Harris@leg.wa.gov, Laurie.Jinkins@leg.wa.gov,
Norm.Johnson@leg.wa.gov, Jim.Moeller@leg.wa.gov, Marcus.Riccelli@leg.wa.gov, June.Robinson@leg.wa.gov, Jay.Rodne@leg.wa.gov, Joe.Schmick@leg.wa.gov,
Shelly.Short@leg.wa.gov, Steve.Tharinger@leg.wa.gov, Kevin.VanDeWege@leg.wa.gov
Kristine’s Example/Form Letter
Dear Representative,
Please support Lyme SB 5448 Recognizing Chronic Lyme disease and protecting the doctors who treat it. This is an extremely important bill and it’s crucial that it be passed. I have been dealing with this disease for years. I did not get properly diagnosed early on and I’m now struggling with debilitating chronic Lyme disease and am extremely ill. I am on disability, very few doctors will treat me, and insurance won’t cover the astronomical medical costs I’m incurring. I implore you to do everything in your power to support and pass this very important bill.
Thank you,
Your name
Additional Example Letters
My Anticipated Letter (As Example)
Dear Senator,
Please support Lyme Bill SB 5448 Recognizing Chronic Lyme disease. I am a former Washington resident with numerous family members still residing in Washington. I am a professional federal biologist who contracted Lyme disease through a tick bite in the course of my fieldwork in Montana in 2010. Despite several acute symptoms and the onset of Bell’s palsy within weeks of the tick bite, I was misdiagnosed for three years. This delay in treatment meant that several months of antibiotics, combined with other therapies, were needed to begin meaningful recovery.
Current testing and diagnostic shortcomings are missing hundreds of thousands of cases of Lyme Disease in the United States annually. Diagnosis and treatment are further complicated by poorly understood and/or poorly acknowledged factors, such as the presence of coinfections (parasites, Bartonella, Babesia, to name but a few). Doctors need the education and procedural freedom to properly diagnose and treat patients, understanding that length of infection and a multitude of additional factors increases the complexity of the illness and the duration and complexity effective treatment (which requires more therapeutic options than antibiotics). Short course antibiotics are not adequate for persistent, Chronic or long-term infection and do not address coinfections, nor other factors critical for recovery.
You can help current and future patients regain their health more effectively, with lesser costs to families and communities, by supporting this legislation. My extended family still resides in Washington as do dozens of other friends and loved ones, almost all of whom recreate in the outdoors avidly. Please consider this information for residents and patients. Recovery should not be impeded by arbitrary limitations.
Thank you,
Angela Daenzer
Highly Generic Letter (Suited to Friends/Family/Anyone)
Please support Lyme Bill SB 5448 Recognizing Chronic Lyme Disease. [Optional:] I have seen first-hand the difficulties in diagnosing and treating this illness through the experiences of my [friend/loved] and the hardship an unnecessary suffering caused by the lack of access to adequate care.
Misdiagnosis and inadequate treatment options currently lead to delayed and inadequate care and, in many cases, permanent damage, disability, or even death. Many aspects of treatment are poorly understood or poorly acknowledged by most physicians, and permitted treatment options under current guidelines are dangerously limited, as are medical practitioners with specific knowledge and experience in the treatment of Lyme Disease and the many complicating factors and coinfections that accompany it. Those practitioners with specific knowledge and experience need to be allowed to treat their patients using effective and adaptive tools of appropriate duration.
Please do all you can to support this legislation and to provide for the needs of Chronic Lyme Disease Patients.
Thank You,
[Name]
Bill & Testimony Summaries
From Substitute Bill Report, March 3 (Current)
Summary of Substitute Bill: The Medical Quality Assurance Commission (MQAC) must do a study of the effects of long-term antibiotic therapy on patients who have been diagnosed with posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome. The study must include a review ofthe following:
- the antibiotics that are commonly involved in long-term treatment of Lyme disease;
- the side effects associated with long-term antibiotic therapy;
- the effectiveness of long-term antibiotic therapy of controlling symptoms;
- whether allowing the practice of long-term antibiotic therapy would be beneficial to the health and safety of Washington residents;
- and any other aspects deemed important for the health and safety of patients who may receive these treatments.
From First-Reading Bill Report, Feb. 2 (Previous)
Physicians, osteopathic physicians, advanced registered nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, and osteopathic physician assistants may prescribe, administer, or dispense long-term antibiotic therapy to a patient who has been diagnosed with Lyme disease. The long-term antibiotic therapy must be for a therapeutic purpose that eliminates or controls the patient’s infection and symptoms. A provider may not be subject to professional disciplinary action solely based upon the provider prescribing, administering, or dispensing long-term antibiotic therapy to a patient who has been diagnosed with Lyme disease.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony on Original Bill (from Mar. 3 Report, linked below)
PRO: There are many misdiagnoses and mistreatments of Lyme disease, especially in Washington State. Lyme disease must be treated for 22 consecutive days and typical antibiotics cannot cure Lyme disease. The symptoms of Lyme disease are preventable if treated properly from the onset. Treatment can help patients return to normal lives. It is difficult to find physicians who treat Lyme disease in Washington. Some military service members who contract the disease go overseas to countries like Germany, where long-term antibiotic treatments are available. Seven other states have authorized the type of long-term treatment in this bill. Contrary to popular belief, ticks in Washington do carry Lyme disease.
OTHER: Evidence-based science has not yet determined the best long-term treatment option for those with chronic Lyme disease. There are also a lot of complications associated with long-term antibiotic treatments. Evidence-based treatments should remain the standard in Washington State. There should be a review of how to improve early diagnosis of Lyme disease in Washington, including more education for providers.
Persons Testifying: PRO: Dan Boeholt, Bill McClelland, Kevin McClelland, Tatsuko Go Hollo, Brianna Cooper, Celena Adler, citizens. OTHER: Charissa Fotinos, Health Care Authority. Signed In, Unable to Testify & Submitted Written Testimony: PRO: Faith Ramirez, Seattle WA Lyme Disease Group.
Relevant Links So Far:
-
Washington Residents, to comment
-
Bill Information
-
Full Text of Bill (at first reading)
-
Bill Report Feb. 2, 2015 (first reading)
-
Substitute Bill Reprt Mar. 3 (as passed senate):
-
Social Media Updates–Facebook page: Ticked Off On Lyme WA
Previous WA Chronic Lyme Bill posts here (include past requests, past background, etc.):
- Washington Proposed S.B. 5448 Would Allow Long Term Antibiotic Treatment For Lyme Disease (Please see draft proposed legislation and/or summary)
- Please Email Senators by Feb 20 ~ WA Proposed Lyme Bill S.B. 5448 Updates ~ Action Needed! (Background only, these letters not longer needed)
- It’s Not Too Late: Contact 49 Senators NOW to Pass Chronic Lyme Bill SB 5448 in WA (Background only, these letters not longer needed)












Preliminary Notes ~ IDSA Comment Period and Mayday Project Webinar
This post has been tidied a bit (3/12/15) but is still intended to provide just preliminary information regarding the announcement of IDSA’s 30-day public comment period (ending April 9) and the Webinar held March 10th by The Mayday Project.
Links to the primary documents plus webinar resources are listed below, and background info regarding past reviews, the guidelines, past recommendations, and the anti-trust investigation are in another ‘rough’ post (including some resources people have recently had questions about): IDSA Lyme Guidelines ~ Background Resources (Public Comment Period Ends April 9)
This was initially posted in a rush to share the basics, as the announcement of the comment period and the webinar came in the midst of a flurry of activity in the Lyme community, largely surrounding the Lyme Disease Challenge, but also calls to action in multiple states regarding legislation and other issues.
Also from March 10, see a post on this blog about the Washington Lyme Bill (needs letters urgently from ANYONE) and posts on that and Oregon’s call to action (Or residents, family, friends, former residents—bill here).
This post will NOT be tidy, just fast, for now. I am completely physically exhausted and herxing.
Please read the announcement from IDSA and associated information on The MayDay project website and facebook page, and from other reputable sources, as more become available. The following starter list also includes webinar resources posted the day after it was held.
Links ~ Starter List (overlaps with links in following sections)
This was too important not to announce immediately, even if hastily posted. I hope to post on this further, but the the list above includes links people should start with, including sites that will be updated by their respective groups as information is available.
Comment Period
Public Comment Period for IDSA/AAN/ACR Lyme Disease Guideline Project Plan
*Warning (as above), when exploring the site, the comment form is a survey tool and must be completed in one sitting. I started to open it to see the ‘questions’ (which is a concerning concept to me so far, as there is an enormous difference between ‘asking for public comment’ versus taking an electronic survey) and received the following:
“Please note that you will need to complete your review in one sitting as your work in progress cannot be saved. Once you hit the “Save & Submit” button at the end, your responses will be recorded and saved.”
*Questions are available in the plan*
Mayday Project Webinar
*Follow Up Webinar Links in List Above
Reasons to Participate in Webinar (preliminary)
I may redact the following quickly-pasted-in comments from Facebook discussions. They were included because it was the quickest way to reflect some of my reasons for urging people to go, based on experiences with receiving and answering comments during government comment periods. They were typed without much information and in a state of extreme exhaustion, so I will likely remove or replace them soon. They’re still here for now because it is worth people’s time to look at the notes and listen to the recording (I’m not sure how well the comments illustrate that but won’t have time to do better).
In a nut shell, my opinion is/was that:
Again, please note that even the sloppiness of this post reflects the urgency of utilizing all tools available.
Please note: Many of the following statements were made with hopeful assumptions about a transparent comment/decision process that may or may not be realistic….but that doesn’t negate the underlying notion that we should do all we can to understand the process (particularly what they are or aren’t bound by).
FB Post: Part 1/3: Please read my following message (regarding some of my own reasons for absolutely listening in if I can) only if you are interested in a perspective to consider, with a grain of salt or what have you. Skip it if you don’t like long messages! I have a few very preliminary thoughts I’d like to share, and think they are worth sharing, based on some different experiences with ‘public’ processes I’ve had. I have to be very careful of adrenaline right now, to keep up health progress I’m making, but I think it’s worth getting this out there in case anyone is interested or on the fence about prioritizing this. If you aren’t looking for input/perspectives/reasons to consider the webinar, or some thoughts on review periods, please skip my following comment. If you perceive anything in it to imply people don’t have a right to submit their own comments or opinions, or that I think people shouldn’t speak for themselves or include emotion at all in comments, then please read it over again with the knowledge that I’m not implying any of the above. Rather, I am suggesting there are ways to maintain all of the above and make sure it gets heard and used (particularly by knowing the process).
FB Post: Part 2/3: As a government employee for many years, I’ve been through many public comment periods from the other side of things. The process itself, or the better ones, somewhat protects the ability of individuals’ comments to be considered independently (sometimes legally so), and should allow all kinds of comments to have to be considered. So there should be a place for experience/impact to come into play—-but I need to get familiar with their process and what they are required to do with comments as fast as possible. And the emotion vs. science isn’t my point at the moment. At the moment, I see a few enormous reasons to listen in tonight if you can. I’m saying this without knowing what will be covered. I just know from years of reviewing public comments that people who are not familiar with the process (whatever that relevant process is) have a lesser change of having their comments or points meaningfully (and separately, if that is the desire of the commenter) considered and recorded. I need to understand what standards they are held to or holding themselves to in their public comment period, and I would invite people to become familiar with that as well. Because if it deviates too much from what a government agency would be held to or other processes that impact policy (as the guidelines do, indirectly and directly, in my opinion) that even THAT needs to be part of our comments. I may add more about science later, not sure. I don’t know if this particular part of things will be covered or not, just saying it’s one of many reasons to read/listen to any info you can to optimize your comments. This a really good way to hear what other people know and are thinking, where they are headed, and lets you get to whatever parts and pieces you need to focus on next.
FB Post: Part 3/3 Information/resources/links….find out what other people have gathered already. Save yourself hours, potentially. May hear something you didn’t know to look for (also good reason to skim comment threads to day, and consider taking notes). You don’t know what you don’t know, which also means you don’t know to look it up…..been some good stuff already today. Have a spreadsheet going so far….
~~ Different Page~~
FB Post: A quick thought from earlier comments I’m seeing that they aren’t [IDSA isn’t] going to listen…..not that I disagree with this sentiment at heart, but a comment period is a chance to get it on record, regardless of what they think of it or want to do. Then it is there, and depending on the requirements of their public comment process (one of my most pressing curiosities, but haven’t gotten to look into it yet) they are hopefully bound to acknowledge each comment. If the process is anything like gov. processes, a response to comments requirement would be great. But at the very least, it gets and keeps the comments on the record. Not listening to comments/science may mean a frustrating set back as in the past, but the comments still get on record, so think about what you want seen, and what has the biggest chance of having an impact, rather than what they will or won’t do. Depending on the process, certain comments may require more detailed consideration or at least response. so in my mind, it is worth it and worth knowing as much about the process as possible….
FB Post: That is part of why I’m glad the webinar is happening and by a group that has related resources to share. At the very least, it will save us all time and help us focus our own efforts. Since the MayDAy Project announced they meet with IDSA, I agree with the idea of not sending comments immadiately that may make that meeting less beneficial. Plus, I’d be skeptical that any of us could compile the kind of comments that will most likely matter that fast. I don’t think anybody’s comment (even if ready) would be that critical to send before next week or even next week, given that April 9 is the end of the comment period.
FB Post: *To clarify, I don’t know that anyone is asking people to wait until next week or any certain time. That was just my own train of thought, thinking that if I were sitting down with IDSA next week, I wouldn’t want to do so with anything (more) suddenly stacked against such a monumental opportunity. The post here said until after the webinar tonight, and I’d really be skeptical that anyone would have a true need to submit a comment TODAY, let alone that they would be able to get it done that fast!